Advisor
with an “o” or Adviser with an “e”. Is there a difference that matters? One way
to evaluate or compare competing models of service is to see how the participants
spend their time. The below analysis is based on my personal experience of nine
years as a Broker (ending
April 2013) and five years as a Investment Adviser.
Customer
Service includes
meeting and/or talking and communicating with clients about their investments,
opening accounts, processing deposits and withdrawals, etc. Administration and Compliance includes
general administration of running the practice, actions to insure compliance
with regulations, and the maintenance of appropriate records.
Sales includes activities related to new
client acquisition and solicitations of clients to buy investments. Investment Review, Selection and Management
is time spent evaluating present and potential investments and investment portfolios,
macro-economic circumstances considered,
in order to achieve clients’ goals and
objectives. Here is an estimate of time spent:
Broker Investment Adviser
Sales 50% 5%
Investment
Management 10% 60%
Service 20% 20%
Admin 20% 15%
Notice
the dramatic difference between the two models of financial services. 30% of
total time attending to client investments versus 80%! A Broker generally spends at least 50% of his
time selling—most of which (70%) is finding new clients. (20 sales calls per day is the norm.) Only 10% of the Broker’s time is normally spent
analyzing investments and clients’ investment portfolios. Annual reviews,
Seminars, and other client communications are often nothing more than an
additional sales opportunity. (One major brokerage firm’s training program
stipulates that the Broker should spend even more than 50% of his time selling—urging
him to delegate the Service activities to a “Sales Assistant”.) Usually investments sold are either
recommended by the home office or are mutual funds recommended by the fund’s sales
force known as a “wholesaler”. An
Investment Manager on the other hand spends only about 5% of his time selling
with the bulk of his time analyzing clients’ portfolios and evaluating
potential investments that might improve portfolio performance.
The
Broker’s income depends primarily on the buying and selling of investments,
primarily from new clients. His skill set is persuasion and the ability to
accept personal rejection. The Investment Adviser’s income in the long run
depends primarily on clients’ satisfaction with the performance of their investment
portfolios. Most of his business comes from referrals and sales related
activities are therefore minimal. His skill set is research, analysis and
problem solving.
Is one model more "expensive" than the other. In my opinion, the cost over the long term is not much different. One difference is that by regulation, the costs dealing with an Investment Adviser are more visible and transparent--there is that fee documented by an invoice each quarter. Dealing with a Broker, the transaction "confirmation" shows the commission that is sometimes quickly forgotten. And, costs associated with mutual funds are buried inside a prospectus and annual report.
My
experience is the successful Broker and the successful Investment Adviser enjoy
about the same amount of income for the same amount of time spent. I do believe however that it is the client’s
best interest to deal with Investment Advisers rather than Brokers. Like
children and flowers, investment portfolios
usually develop better with more individual attention---this belief and
opinion is strong enough that I stopped being a Broker and work solely now as
an Investment Adviser/Manager.
This paper is for educational purposes and for the sake of discussion. It is not a sales presentation and not a recommendation or personal investment advice. Opinions provided are exclusively those of Wayne Strout and are not the opinions by any financial institution. All investing involves significant risk of loss and there is no proven method to eliminate that risk. Most investing involves costs. A complete analysis of these costs should be undertaken before making any choice. Costs, risks and expected results should all be weighed in the balance.
No comments:
Post a Comment